Keyword summary
0%35 analyzed articles/videos21,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Report For America results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 5,776 hits. Analysis detected 64,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 93,311 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (35,612 of 37,536 keywords). This Report For America is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Report For America
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
6%Report For America (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 93,311
Article count: 35
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751005.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score35 analyzed articles93.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate