KUER0%

Downtown Ogden enters its paid parking era 33%

By Macy Lipkin0%

6/22/2026, 11:47:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 799 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,194 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the article peer group.

Monday afternoon looked like a typical summer day on Ogden’s 25th Street: couples eating outside on patios, people leaving coffee shops with iced beverages in hand, one block closed off ahead of a concert. 
But something was different. 
June 22 was the first day for paid parking in parts of Ogden’s downtown. 
“It took a minute to get through the wonky website and app,” said Gary Johnson as he and his wife, Stephanie, walked to their car after lunch. 
“But yeah, it's no different than living in Salt Lake. 
You pay for parking.” 
Ogden is now on the short list of Utah cities that charge for street parking. 
Meters have been a mainstay in Salt Lake City since the late 1930s, and Park City began charging to park in the 1990s. 
But parking in Ogden is still cheaper than in Salt Lake  $1.50 an hour for on-street and $1.00 for parking lots and the WonderBlock garage, compared to $3.50 per hour for street parking in the capital. 
For now, paid parking is limited to 25th Street between Wall Avenue and Washington Boulevard, plus Electric Alley, the WonderBlock East Garage and the Municipal Lot. 
Parking is still free on cross streets and at Union Station. 
It’s already changing the Johnsons’ habits. 
They finished eating before their parking expired, so they walked about 15 minutes to visit another shop before heading out. 
But in the future, Stephanie sees herself coming downtown less often. 
Paying is a hassle, she said, and she worries about people with limited mobility who don’t have a handicap placard to display for free parking. 
As she left a paint-your-own pottery studio, Gracie Parkhurst said she and her sisters had parked a couple of blocks away for free. 
“It's a little bit more of a walk, because you have to go down the street, but you know, anything to avoid the fee,” she said with a laugh. 
She doesn’t come downtown often, but at a time when people are looking to cut costs wherever possible, having to pay for the most convenient spots makes her want to visit less. 
It’s also a big adjustment for longtime residents. 
“For some of us, it's like 20 years of not having to pay for it, and now we do, and so that is kind of frustrating,” Parkhurst said. 
The city’s decision to charge for parking angered many residents and business owners, who spoke up at city council meetings and signed a petition as a last-ditch effort to stop the plan. 
The city paused implementation after pushback in 2024 before announcing a revamped plan with a free 15-minute window and discounted employee parking. 
But not all business owners see it as a bad thing. 
Ron Yeates, who owns the No Frills Diner On 25th, said his restaurant relies on parking spots turning over. 
“It's hard when people just park there all day long, and you see the same car there hour after hour after hour,” he said. 
“And I've had dozens of people tell me they don't come down here anymore because there's nowhere to park.” 
He’s conflicted because he doesn’t think people should have to pay to park, but he supports a system that will make it easier for customers to come and eat. 
Ogden has been driving toward paid parking for years. 
A 2021 study recommended paid parking as an early step to “allow for catalytic redevelopment of Ogden’s downtown core.” 
The mixed-use WonderBlock development will increase traffic downtown and require more parking, said city spokesperson Mike McBride. 
A private developer is building the apartments and retail space, and the city is building two parking garages, one of which is already open. 
With a bond authorized up to $85 million, the structures weren’t cheap. 
“It had to be done to accommodate the number of vehicles and the number of businesses, the number of people that are going to bring a massive economic benefit to downtown Ogden,” McBride said. 
Part of the city’s plan was to use revenue from paid parking to pay off the parking garage. 
But by this spring, the goal shifted, and managed parking is now “intended to generate sufficient revenue to meet ongoing operating costs.” 
At the current rate, net income from paid parking is expected to cover about 3% of the city’s $3.5 million parking structure debt. 
That revenue could shrink or grow, McBride said. 
“We need to make it through a period of time to reevaluate whether we move into phase two of a managed parking system or even into ultimately a way larger picture, which might be an expanded footprint in downtown Ogden, and even outside of downtown,” he said. 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member who reports for KUER in northern Utah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Macy Lipkin: 2.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 4.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 1.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 1.1%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias1.1%This article: 3.9%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 9.6%Macy Lipkin: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 10.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion10.8%This article: 7.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias7.8%This article: 5.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.0%This article: 12.3%Macy Lipkin: 5.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias12.3%This article: 1.4%Macy Lipkin: 2.1%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias1.4%This article: 15.0%Macy Lipkin: 5.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias15.0%This article: 2.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.3%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority5.3%This article: 3.6%Macy Lipkin: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 5.9%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.0%Macy Lipkin: 3.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 4.6%Macy Lipkin: 2.2%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.6%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%Macy Lipkin: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.9%Macy Lipkin: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground1.4%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.4%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote3.4%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.5%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.7%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

799 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers48%attributed speech413writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGary Johnson • 27 words • 100.0% coverageGary Johnson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGary Johnson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageStephanie • 11 words • 0.0% coverageStephanie • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGracie Parkhurst • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGracie Parkhurst • 29 words • 0.0% coverageGracie Parkhurst • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageParkhurst • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRon Yeates • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRon Yeates • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRon Yeates • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRon Yeates • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMike McBride • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMike McBride • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMike McBride • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike McBride • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Parkhurst

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words7.3% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Parkhurst: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.