Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parkhurst results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and Sunk Cost Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,204 of 27,495 speakers). This Parkhurst is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Parkhurst
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos