KUER0%

Utahns are debating fireworks bans. Here’s why some towns can and others can’t 22%

By Macy Lipkin0%

6/25/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 673 faulty-reasoning hits from 479 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,535 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

It’s fireworks season in Utah. 
Between June 24 and July 25, it is legal to buy them. 
But as the state surpasses 135,000 acres burned this year, some cities and towns are trying to figure out what power they have over pyrotechnics. 
So far this year, humans have caused 76% of Utah’s wildfires, including the Iron Fire in Juab County that has forced the evacuation of Eureka. 
While fireworks typically cause only a fraction of fires, many residents still worry that Fourth of July celebrations will spark more damage. 
When it comes to banning fireworks, it’s complicated. 
Gov. 
Spencer Cox told reporters he doesn’t have the authority to prohibit them statewide. 
State law dictates that cities and towns can ban the discharge of fireworks in areas with “hazardous environmental conditions.” 
That includes mountainous areas covered in vegetation, spots near parks and canyons and the wildland-urban interface, where development meets undeveloped land and wilderness. 
Cities like Salt Lake, Ogden, St. 
George and Saratoga Springs have taken that step for high-risk areas, but they’re still limited in what they can do. 
Fireworks restrictions cover much of Saratoga Springs, but a citywide ban, which some residents have suggested, is not an option, said spokesperson AnnElise Harrison. 
Still, much of the city’s restriction map is red, meaning fireworks are not allowed. 
“All the red we could do, we did,” Harrison said. 
The city is boxed in by mountains and Utah Lake, and it’s already had six fires this month, Harrison said. 
The city plans to spread the word on the rules with postcards and signage, and Harrison is optimistic. 
She said the city hasn’t had any fires started by legally discharged fireworks in its nearly 29-year history. 
“That we have residents that are concerned about it, that shows that our residents are aware, and again, they are going to be cautious,” Harrison said. 
Stockton, a small town in Tooele County, is taking more aggressive measures. 
The town banned fireworks for the rest of 2026, something they’ve done for the past 10 years, said Mayor Joe Johnston. 
They can do that because the whole town is a wildland-urban interface area, according to the fire chief. 
“The big thing that we don't want to do is burn down our communities,” Johnston said. 
Springdale, just outside Zion National Park, made the same call. 
The town banned fireworks and open fires citywide, citing the historically dry winter. 
The town council determined that all property in the town is within hazardous environmental conditions. 
Mayor Barbara Bruno felt that was the right decision. 
“I would have been surprised and disappointed had we not done that, because we've done it every other year when the conditions were like this,” she said. 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member who reports for KUER in northern Utah. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Macy Lipkin: 2.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Macy Lipkin: 4.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic12.5%This article: 3.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Macy Lipkin: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect1.7%This article: 3.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion3.3%This article: 10.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias10.0%This article: 10.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect10.0%This article: 9.2%Macy Lipkin: 5.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 2.1%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Macy Lipkin: 5.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias11.9%This article: 2.1%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 1.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.6%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority13.6%This article: 4.2%Macy Lipkin: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Macy Lipkin: 3.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.4%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion10.4%This article: 5.4%Macy Lipkin: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 12.1%Macy Lipkin: 2.2%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.1%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.6%Macy Lipkin: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal4.6%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.7%Macy Lipkin: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.7%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading5.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.3%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice3.3%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.5%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.7%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

479 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech295writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAnnElise Harrison • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnnElise Harrison • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAnnElise Harrison • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAnnElise Harrison • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAnnElise Harrison • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Johnston • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Johnston • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBarbara Bruno • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBarbara Bruno • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Barbara Bruno

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words20% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Barbara Bruno: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.