Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Bruno results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 112.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (12,873 of 27,653 speakers). This Barbara Bruno is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Barbara Bruno
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
35.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos