Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,376 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juab County results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 788 hits . Analysis detected 6,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,028 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,608 of 35,444 keywords). This Juab County is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Juab County
Keyword details
Total words: 11,028
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst