Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saratoga Springs results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 5,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,988 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,909 of 37,530 keywords). This Saratoga Springs is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Saratoga Springs
Keyword details
Total words: 7,988
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst