Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 779 hits. Analysis detected 7,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,085 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Utah Division Of Wildlife Resources
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,938
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos