Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife And Animals results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,477 hits . Analysis detected 17,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,474 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,184 of 37,530 keywords). This Wildlife And Animals is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Wildlife And Animals
Keyword details
Total words: 26,474
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles26.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst