Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos12,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting Rights Act results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 9,600 hits. Analysis detected 62,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,641 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,787 of 15,650 topics). This Voting Rights Act is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles52.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate