Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamil Smith results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 1,642 hits . Analysis detected 7,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,776 of 6,628 authors). This Jamil Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Jamil Smith
Author details
Total words: 4,792
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.2% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.3% 34.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.8% 15.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst