Topic summary
â 74% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Suppression results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 4,303 hits . Analysis detected 36,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,392 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of â 44% (9,018 of 15,955 topics). This Voter Suppression is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Voter Suppression
Topic details
Total words: 25,392
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.0% 16.0% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst