Topic summary
30% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usmca results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 17,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,625 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,823 of 16,562 topics). This Usmca is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Usmca
Topic details
Total words: 21,625
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst