Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 7,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Military Operations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,103 hits . Analysis detected 21,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,660 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,879 of 15,769 topics). This Us Military Operations is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Us Military Operations
Topic details
Total words: 30,660
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles30.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst