Topic summary
62% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Midterm Elections results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 4,498 hits . Analysis detected 30,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,511 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,329 of 15,707 topics). This Us Midterm Elections is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Us Midterm Elections
Topic details
Total words: 27,511
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst