Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Talks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,321 hits. Analysis detected 9,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,440 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,714 of 15,769 topics). This US Iran Talks is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
US Iran Talks

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos