Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-Iran Negotiations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 526 hits. Analysis detected 4,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,975 of 16,562 topics). This Us-Iran Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Us-Iran Negotiations
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos