Topic summary
68% 141 analyzed articles/videos 102,975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Foreign Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 60,518 hits . Analysis detected 563,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 517,329 analyzed words across 140 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,647 of 15,144 topics). This Us Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Us Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 517,329
Article count: 140
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score140 analyzed articles517.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst