Truthout75%

Trump Downplays 18 US Soldier Deaths in Iran War Hours Before Dignified Transfer 67%

By Chris Walker53%

7/22/2026, 8:36:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 653 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,024 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the article peer group.

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump attended a dignified transfer ceremony for U.S. soldiers who were killed in the U.S.’s unauthorized and unprovoked war on Iran, which Trump launched in February and has recently escalated. 
Trump said in a Truth Social post shortly before the ceremony began that he was attending the event to “honor” the fallen servicemembers. 
The ceremony came just a day after Trump faced widespread criticism for a separate social media post in which he appeared to downplay soldiers’ deaths in the war. 
In that post, Trump shared a chart that compared the U.S. death toll in the Iran war to the number of U.S. soldiers killed in other U.S.-involved conflicts, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, and Vietnam. 
The chart depicted the 18 deaths over the first few months of the Iran War as a far lower death toll than in other conflicts. 
“These are the real facts. 
REPORT THEM!” 
Trump demanded in his post. 
Trump has issued similar complaints throughout the war. 
In May, when 13 U.S. servicemembers had been killed so far, he said that he got “a kick” out of people citing their deaths to criticize the war. 
Trump’s “flippant attitude as he talks about the deaths is disgusting and disrespectful to the families and the service members’ sacrifices,” Michael T. 
McPhearson, executive director for Veterans for Peace, said in comments to Truthout at the time. 
Trump was lambasted for sharing the chart on Tuesday night, just hours before he was set to take part in the dignified transfer ceremony. 
“He’s basically saying only 18 [dead], we should take that as a win. 
 Even for him, shocking,” opined MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle. 
“It is sickening that the President would downplay the loss of 18 American soldiers killed during his ongoing Iran war & brag about how it’s not AS bad as some of the other disastrous American wars he promised he’d never repeat,” said Sen. 
Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland). 
According to Al Jazeera, at least 3,468 Iranians have been killed in the joint U.S.-Israeli war on the country so far. 
Another 26,500 have been injured, though these figures have not been updated since major hostilities resumed earlier this month. 
In comments to reporters on his way to the dignified transfer ceremony, Trump made the audacious claim that the deceased soldiers had stated support for his aims in the war. 
“All of them said very strongly, ‘We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon,'” Trump said. 
The war has not resulted in Iran agreeing to limit its nuclear capabilities. 
In fact, Iran had already promised not to develop nuclear weapons during negotiations before the war began. 
When a reporter noted that most Americans are “firmly against this war,” Trump interrupted before the question could proceed, asserting that Americans backed the war despite overwhelming evidence showing otherwise. 
“Americans aren’t against the war. 
A poll just came out,” he said. 
“Americans don’t want high gasoline prices, but they’re not against the war. 
That just came out loud and clear in a poll.” 
Several polls demonstrate that the war is unpopular among the American public. 
A Fox News poll in May showed that 60 percent of voters were opposed to the war, with only 40 percent in support. 
A Washington Post/Ipsos poll from earlier this month  when a temporary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was still tepidly in place  found that nearly 7 in 10 Americans (68 percent) felt the war was not worth fighting. 
And an Economist/YouGov poll from last week showed that 65 percent of Americans wanted the war to end “as soon as possible,” with only 15 percent saying they supported it continuing. 
“The war with Iran is the most unpopular conflict among Americans since polls have been taken. 
That has been true since the war’s first day,” political scientist Larry Sabato said earlier this month. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.4%Chris Walker: 6.1%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias21.4%This article: 5.8%Chris Walker: 1.0%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias5.8%This article: 12.9%Chris Walker: 3.0%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic12.9%This article: 3.5%Chris Walker: 1.3%Truthout: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 4.6%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 2.1%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Chris Walker: 5.6%Truthout: 10.1%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.8%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.3%Truthout: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.5%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.6%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%Chris Walker: 9.6%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias34.2%This article: 4.6%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.6%This article: 5.2%Chris Walker: 1.2%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 2.1%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.6%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.5%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 8.6%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man8.6%This article: 3.5%Chris Walker: 3.0%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority3.5%This article: 0.8%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.2%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.5%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning1.5%This article: 15.6%Chris Walker: 5.8%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization15.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.7%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon7.7%This article: 12.6%Chris Walker: 6.9%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.7%Chris Walker: 2.6%Truthout: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.7%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.2%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof7.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Chris Walker: 1.7%Truthout: 2.8%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 3.1%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 6.3%Chris Walker: 6.0%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice6.3%This article: 0.3%Chris Walker: 2.8%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 10.1%Chris Walker: 5.7%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Chris Walker: 3.8%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

653 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers26%attributed speech486writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMichael T. McPhearson • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageMSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSen. Chris Van Hollen • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAl Jazeera • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Sabato • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sen. Chris Van Hollen

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words26% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Left Leaning B-13.6 ptsWriter: 13.6%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.4 ptsWriter: 0.4%Sen. Chris Van Hollen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.