Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Iran Relations results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 2,071 hits . Analysis detected 13,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,686 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,182 of 16,562 topics). This U S Iran Relations is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. U S Iran Relations
Topic details
Total words: 11,686
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst