Topic summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Department Of Homeland Security results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 2,541 hits . Analysis detected 12,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,584 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,282 of 16,562 topics). This U S Department Of Homeland Security is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. U S Department Of Homeland Security
Topic details
Total words: 11,584
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 21.9% 21.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst