Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucson Arizona Search results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,799 hits. Analysis detected 8,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,368 of 16,562 topics). This Tucson Arizona Search is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Tucson Arizona Search

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.6%24.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos