Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucker Carlson results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 2,884 hits. Analysis detected 20,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,784 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,629 of 15,488 topics). This Tucker Carlson is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Tucker Carlson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,784
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos