Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Boswell results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,217 hits . Analysis detected 7,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,596 of 6,359 authors). This Josh Boswell is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Josh Boswell
Author details
Total words: 7,456
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst