Topic summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Traffic Collision results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 681 hits . Analysis detected 3,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,459 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,198 of 16,562 topics). This Traffic Collision is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Traffic Collision
Topic details
Total words: 2,459
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst