Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amaray D. Alvarez results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 659 hits . Analysis detected 2,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 92% (593 of 6,628 authors). This Amaray D. Alvarez is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Amaray D. Alvarez
Author details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.1% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 43.5% 43.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 28.1% 28.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 11.0% 11.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.3% 26.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 43.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.3%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst