Topic summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Tariffs results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 1,523 hits . Analysis detected 12,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,501 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,462 of 16,562 topics). This Trade Tariffs is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Trade Tariffs
Topic details
Total words: 12,501
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst