Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nora Colomer results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 2,763 hits . Analysis detected 10,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,685 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,879 of 6,315 authors). This Nora Colomer is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Nora Colomer
Author details
Total words: 8,685
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.8% 31.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 31.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst