Topic summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 16,903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tornado Recovery results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 7,636 hits . Analysis detected 55,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 67,336 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,881 of 15,448 topics). This Tornado Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Tornado Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 67,336
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles67.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst