Topic summary
64% 22 analyzed articles/videos 14,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Industry results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 7,481 hits . Analysis detected 75,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,396 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,986 of 15,988 topics). This Tech Industry is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Tech Industry
Topic details
Total words: 69,396
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score22 analyzed articles69.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst