Topic summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 11,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Targeting Iran results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 8,277 hits . Analysis detected 61,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,461 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,771 of 16,562 topics). This Targeting Iran is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Targeting Iran
Topic details
Total words: 42,461
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles42.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst