Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hooman Majd results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 3,774 hits . Analysis detected 26,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,016 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,807 of 6,137 authors). This Hooman Majd is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Hooman Majd
Author details
Total words: 15,016
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.1% 25.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.8% 15.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.2% 16.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst