Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos7,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Collins results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,655 hits. Analysis detected 23,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,544 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,671 of 16,447 topics). This Susan Collins is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Susan Collins
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos