Topic summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Leader results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,113 hits . Analysis detected 11,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,454 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (12,005 of 16,562 topics). This Supreme Leader is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Supreme Leader
Topic details
Total words: 12,454
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst