Topic summary
65% 18 analyzed articles/videos 15,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Ruling results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 6,921 hits . Analysis detected 65,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,790 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,594 of 15,689 topics). This Supreme Court Ruling is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Supreme Court Ruling
Topic details
Total words: 64,790
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score18 analyzed articles64.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst