Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Birle results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 545 hits . Analysis detected 3,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,601 of 6,269 authors). This Jack Birle is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Jack Birle
Author details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst