Topic summary
⁠47%5 analyzed articles/videos2,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stocks results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,426 hits. Analysis detected 14,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,871 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,521 of 16,562 topics). This Stocks is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Stocks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,871
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos