Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Alexander results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 498 hits . Analysis detected 4,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,616 of 6,561 authors). This Dan Alexander is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Dan Alexander
Author details
Total words: 7,280
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst