Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Race results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 2,264 hits. Analysis detected 12,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,777 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,283 of 16,558 topics). This Space Race is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Space Race
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,777
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos