Topic summary
40%7 analyzed articles/videos3,931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Korea results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,525 hits. Analysis detected 14,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,454 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,293 of 15,758 topics). This South Korea is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
South Korea
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate