Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shahana Yasmin results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,579 of 6,364 authors). This Shahana Yasmin is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Shahana Yasmin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠60%Shahana Yasmin (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,384
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos