Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanna Foreman results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 646 hits . Analysis detected 6,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,449 of 6,275 authors). This Hanna Foreman is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Hanna Foreman
Author details
Total words: 7,944
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.3% 6.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst