Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sound Politics results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 63 hits . Analysis detected 264 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.8% and a BS Rank of 99% (285 of 16,562 topics). This Sound Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Sound Politics
Topic details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.3% percentile 18.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles156 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 40.4% 40.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 30.8% 30.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 30.8% 30.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.2% 19.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Topic 40.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst