Topic summary
65% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Influencers results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,681 hits . Analysis detected 14,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,538 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,579 of 16,562 topics). This Social Media Influencers is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Social Media Influencers
Topic details
Total words: 19,538
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst