Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,765 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Race results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 2,312 hits . Analysis detected 19,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,060 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,642 of 16,562 topics). This Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Senate Race
Topic details
Total words: 15,060
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.4% 6.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst