Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,091 hits . Analysis detected 4,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,335 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (15,217 of 15,447 topics). This San Diego is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. San Diego
Topic details
Total words: 11,335
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst