Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maanvi Singh results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 599 hits . Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,157 of 6,348 authors). This Maanvi Singh is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Maanvi Singh
Author details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.1% 26.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst