Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Antonio Spurs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 2,131 hits . Analysis detected 14,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,684 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,770 of 15,689 topics). This San Antonio Spurs is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. San Antonio Spurs
Topic details
Total words: 16,684
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst