Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royalty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,782 hits. Analysis detected 15,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,818 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,637 of 16,358 topics). This Royalty is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Royalty
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate