Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royalty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,782 hits . Analysis detected 15,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,818 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,637 of 16,358 topics). This Royalty is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Royalty
Topic details
Total words: 11,818
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst