Author summary
ā 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Pisa results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 2,990 hits . Analysis detected 26,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,870 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ā 68% (2,012 of 6,135 authors). This Nick Pisa is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Nick Pisa
Author details
Total words: 16,870
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.7% 17.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.8% 15.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 17.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst